Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Plastic Bag Street Art
Monday, September 21, 2009
Spring
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Substitute Swear Sayings

This picture depicts Dr. Evil, a character from the Austin Powers movies, using the substitute swear word “frickin’” in place of the word “fucking.” Although he does not in fact use the profanity, he replaces it with a similar sounding word that carries exactly the same meaning, but, oddly enough, is deemed with much less stigma. The role of language is to convey thoughts in a way that can be understood to other people. In the case of profanities, the thought is normally interpreted as rude, vulgar, and disrespectful and therefore using the words is generally considered coarse. There is now a whole array of words that are used in place of these profanities but are used in the same manner, are spelled very similarly, and carry the exact same meaning, but because they aren’t themselves profanities, they are inoffensive. If we can substitute words for each other to abstain from vulgarity, would it be possible to substitute other vulgarities with new inoffensive actions or is this phenomena purely lingual?
Knowledge and Experience
The Stranglehold of English Lit
This website has posted what they believe to be the 100 greatest novels of all time. Of all the authors on the list only one was born in a non-English speaking country, Vladamir Nabokov, but he wrote almost all of his major works in English including the work that made the list. This clearly demonstrates the dominance of English literature on the artistic world. We know that there have been great works written in other cultures in different languages but none of these works have made the list. Why has this specific language taken over literature and do the same criteria that judge English literature transcend other cultures? Are there qualities of some books that are lost in translation? Can literature be universally good? Has this dominance had an effect on the literature written in other cultures so that they may compete with such a competitor?
Friday, September 4, 2009
Shamanism or Shizophrenia?

This video is about the way that Western society views people with schizophrenia in contrast to the way tribal cultures view shamanism. The video explores the stigmata assigned to people who have mental processes that we can’t understand and the resulting casting off that these people must go through. Is it productive to treat people who are different by ostracizing them into lock-up the same way we do criminals? Shaman’s act in very similar ways to people who exhibit schizophrenic behavior but they are treated as polar opposites in their respective societies: the former as an outcast who must be treated; the latter as revered leader from which there is much to be learned. We feel it necessary to treat schizophrenics in hopes that we can coax them to think more normally but in shamanistic cultures they are armed codes, traditions, and tools that have been handed down for generations so that they can expand their thought. Is it morally justifiable to stamp someone as diseased and prescribe treatment because we can’t understand them? Why as a culture, do we fear madness?